I’ve just inherited a loved one’s estate. How can a financial adviser help me?
When one inherits money from a loved one, often the emotions are mixed. When the need to deal with the inheritance arises, many people are still dealing with extreme grief. This makes it even more difficult to determine how to deal with the transfer of funds and/or property, especially when there are usually different parties—with often very different perspectives and financial goals—involved in this decision. This can be a very emotionally draining time for all.
Moving away from the emotional issues, let’s talk about the financial considerations in terms of the inherited investments.
When a parent, or other family member, dies, one of the biggest mistakes that the beneficiaries make is leaving the investments as they are, without doing any research into how they are allocated or considering alternative options. Why could this be a mistake? Because the portfolio was set up for someone typically 20 to 30 years older than the individuals who inherit the funds, and it may not fit well with their own financial goals. Also, the beneficiaries may not realize that there is a real opportunity with many investment for them to receive a “step up in basis” if they decide to sell, which means they can sell them at the value upon death with NO TAXES. This gives them a good opportunity to reposition the assets to be in line with their investment goals and risk tolerance. If the original investments are held for too long, the fear of capital gains could once more be an issue and repositioning to the “appropriate” positions may never be done.
Furthermore, it is absolutely critical to establish one’s own financial plan prior to deciding how to invest the inheritance because some companies offer different settlement options. And if you get talked into a settlement option that is not in your best interest, it may be impossible to change.
One of the biggest mistakes people make with investment inheritances is that they accept the death benefits without planning. Why is this a problem?
For example, let’s look at four million dollar estate that was left by generation 1 after already paying estate taxes (which could be as high as 48 percent on everything inherited over $2,000,000). Let’s say that the beneficiary (generation 2) is a 62-year-old man who has planned and invested well enough that he does not need the inheritance for his own financial security, but takes it anyways (because that’s what over 90 percent of Americans do). If he takes it, and then dies a year later, for example, the 48 percent estate tax will again deplete the inheritance his beneficiaries (generation 3). Estate taxes could deplete the original inheritance by another $2,000,000; however, with the proper planning in place, all $4,000,000 could have remained, avoiding both the first and second taxation.*
Troy V. Collins, RFC.**
President, McKinley Financial Group
Phone: (650) 551-8900
CA Insurance Lic. No. 0B96613
www.mkfinancial.com
* This material has been prepared for informational purposes only; it is not intended to provide and should not be relied upon for financial, legal, or tax advice.
** Registered Representative offering securities through First Allied Securities, Inc., a Registered Broker/Dealer Member FINRA/SIPC.
Investment Advisor Representative offering services through First Allied Advisory Services.
Related posts:


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8022621c-c1d0-4b7a-a1e1-43e056882126)




