Real Estate: What is it for? Part 3

One of the things that I have found over the years in working with clients that own real estate portfolios is that people love buying real estate, but they constantly make fundamental mistakes when doing so. The starting point in deciding what to buy and how to buy it should begin with the answer to this question: What is it for?

This may seem like a silly question, but as a financial advisor I need to know the time frame, expectations, and, most importantly, whether the property will be used to create income, for growth, or for growth and income (both).

This is the third in a series of four discussions on the appropriate investment strategy for each.

Real Estate for Growth and Income

In Parts 1 and 2, we separated out the distinctly different reasons for investing in real estate: growth or Income. In this article, my purpose is to try and make sense in blending the two. How can you do both? It may be that you need two different properties? It may be that one can do it.

Let’s say that a client came to me with a rental property that was worth one million dollars and had net rents (before tax) of $25,000 per year. His property was paid up, and Bob is content with his increase in income each year of about 4 percent (based on rent increases, if not rent controlled). I might look at this rental property and identify a few weaknesses. The first would be that the rents give Bob a 2.5 percent yield, which is not great for income. The second would be that he has virtually NO TAX BENEFITS. A third would be that he is not using his capital wisely to use what I would consider THE major reason for buying real estate, LEVERAGE!

If this is for income only, I could find individual bonds that might pay 4 to 5 percent, which would give more income than the property.* If it is for growth, then leverage might be a key. Bob wants both Income and growth. What do we do?

I might suggest that Bob look for replacement properties, two or more of them. It may be possible to find a property that has a 6 percent cap rate. If so, he could invest $500,000 into this property (all cash) and create $30,000 of income from just half as much money. Then he could find another property for growth in which he could put down, say, $500,000 on a $1M property (or four for $250,000 each).

What is the outcome of doing this? We still have $30,000 in cash flow. But now we have $1.5M of real estate appreciating for us instead of $1M. At a 5 percent growth rate, this is $25,000 more in year one alone. What is the risk? If you owned a $1M property outright and the tenant vacated, you would have no income. If that happens in our scenario, you have no income and you have a mortgage payment. So what you could gain on the top end can be at some risk. This is why for the income producing properties we often look to nonpublicly traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) or something with LONG term leases.** Having a company such as Home Depot or Walmart as a tenant with a signed 20-year lease can often eliminate much of the vacancy concerns. Thus, if the other property were vacant, you would still be able to cover the debt putting you in a similar situation as if you owned just one building outright.

It is important to consider all options when investing in any kind of real estate, but the more you know, the better.***

Troy Collins

* Bonds are subject to a variety of risk, the most visible of which is interest rate risk. If a bond is sold prior to maturity, the investor may receive back more or less than the original amount invested.

** Investing in real estate and real estate investment trust (REITS) may not be suitable for all investors and involves special risks, such as limited liquidity and demand for real property, changes in supply and demand for real property, changes in law, tenant turnover or defaults, loss of investment, competition, casualty losses, and use of leverage. Real estate values may fluctuate based on economic, environmental, and other factors. There is no assurance that the investment objectives of any real estate program will be obtained.

***Note/disclaimer: this article is over-simplified in many ways and is for illustrative purposes only. McKinley Financial is not recommending any specific product, nor are we recommending that you purchase real estate.

Troy V. Collins, RFC.
President, McKinley Financial Group
Phone: (650) 551-8900
CA Insurance Lic. No. 0B96613
www.mkfinancial.com
 
Registered Representative offering securities through First Allied Securities, Inc., a registered Broker/Dealer Member FINRA/SIPC.
Investment Advisor Representative offering services through First Allied Advisory Services.

Related posts:

1. Real Estate: What is it for? Part 4
2. Real Estate for Growth* Part 2
3. Real Estate: What is it for?